All species / Lamna nasus

Lamna nasus

Porbeagle Shark · (Bonnaterre, 1788)

Lamna nasus, Porbeagle Shark
(c) mumudu, some rights reserved (CC BY-NC) · via inaturalist, stored and served from this site
Red List, global
VU
Vulnerable, 2019
First CITES listing
III
Appendix III, 2012, by Belgium
CITES trade records
78
2012–2023 · exporter-reported
Unit dimensions
2
reported separately, never summed
NAMMCO catch entries
none
NAMMCO reports a subset of marine mammals
Seizure records
3
reported taxon matches

One of 43: each square a species, coloured by its latest global Red List category, this one ringed. Porbeagle Shark is among the sharks.

In summary derived

Lamna nasus, Porbeagle Shark, is placed in family Lamnidae, order Lamniformes, class Chondrichthyes. It was first listed in Appendix III in 2012, by Belgium. The earliest CITES listing row the corpus holds for it is Appendix II, dated 2013, a later entry than the 2012 listing. The corpus records 2 dated listing rows in total.

Its latest global Red List assessment is Vulnerable, published 2019. It carries 2 earlier global assessments on the current scale and 1 on a scale that was superseded before the current categories and cannot be compared with them.

The corpus holds 78 exporter-reported CITES trade records for it, from 2012 to 2023, reported across 2 unit dimensions. The most frequently recorded term is fins: 37 records across 2 unit dimensions, of which 27 are measured in specimens. The corpus holds no NAMMCO catch records for it. 3 seizure records are attributed to it, being those whose reported taxon matches the species.

Composed from 18 corpus fields, by template, with no model
  • species.class
  • species.family
  • species.order_name
  • species_catch.catch_total
  • species_iucn.is_global
  • species_iucn.status
  • species_iucn.year_published
  • species_listing.appendix
  • species_listing.listing_date
  • species_listing_event.appendix
  • species_listing_event.event_date
  • species_seizure.*
  • species_trade.dimension
  • species_trade.first_year
  • species_trade.last_year
  • species_trade.record_count
  • species_trade.reporter_type
  • species_trade.term

Each sentence is generated from the columns above and nothing else. The same corpus produces the same text every time. Where a field is absent the sentence is omitted rather than hedged.

Overview curated

Taxonomy entered by a named curator and versioned in the repository.

Class
Chondrichthyes
Order
Lamniformes
Family
Lamnidae
First CITES listing
20122 listing rows; later ones are amendments
Global Red List status
VUVulnerable, assessed 2019
This taxonomy differs from the name CITES reports
  • Class: CITES reports Elasmobranchii; this site uses Chondrichthyes. CITES reports the subclass Elasmobranchii in its class field; Chondrichthyes is the class rank.
4 subpopulations are assessed separately

A single status for this species does not describe them: Mediterranean subpopulation, Northeast Atlantic subpopulation, Northwest Atlantic subpopulation, Southern Hemisphere subpopulation.

Content withheld pending expert review

8 narrative sections for this species were machine-drafted and are not shown. No subject expert has reviewed and signed them.

Trade derived

CITES Trade Database v2025.1, extracted 13 June 2025.

There is no single trade total

Quantities are reported per unit dimension, per traded term, and per reporting side. These are not additive: kilograms and individual animals have no common unit, a live animal is not a carving, and an importer report and an exporter report are two accounts of one shipment rather than two shipments.

Figures below are exporter-reported.

count in specimens
60
mass in kg
18

Records per dimension. Not additive across units.

Trade over time

listed 20122012: 1 records2013: 4 records2014: 5 records2015: 6 records2016: 14 records2017: 8 records2018: 28 records2019: 2 records2020: 6 records2021: 3 records2023: 1 records2020
Peak 28 records in 2018. Trade records per year, exporter-reported, every term and unit counted as records, not quantities.
listed 20122013: 2 specimens2015: 12 specimens2016: 14 specimens2017: 10 specimens2018: 18 specimens2019: 2 specimens
Peak 18 specimens in 2018. Quantity of fins, the term with most records (27), in specimens, exporter-reported. Other terms are in the tables below, each in its own unit.

count measured in specimens

60 of 78 records carry a quantity in specimens. CITES leaves the unit blank to mean a count of the term.

Bars count trade records per term, not specimens, all sources combined; the table splits them by source and gives the quantity in specimens.
TermQuantityRecordsYearsSource
specimens20,413 specimens212017–2020W
fins36 specimens152015–2018W
fins22 specimens122013–2019O
bodies10 specimens52016W
bones45 specimens42020W
specimens1 specimen12012O
bones1 specimen12016O
skulls1 specimen12021W

mass measured in kg

18 of 78 records carry a quantity in kg.

Bars count trade records per term, not kg, all sources combined; the table splits them by source and gives the quantity in kg.
TermQuantityRecordsYearsSource
meat1,940.64 kg72014–2016W
fins685.54 kg62013–2021W
fins3,621.6 kg42014–2021O
fin (dried)290 kg12023W

CITES listings curated

CoP decisions, cross-checked against the appendix reported on trade records.

First listed on 2012-09-25, in Appendix III by Belgium, from the CITES listing history. The table below holds the species' current listing entries, which begin later; earlier coverage is often under a higher taxon.

DateAppendixAnnotationStatus
2013-06-12IInoneearliest current entry
2014-09-14IIListing adopted at CoP16 in March 2013 with entry into effect delayed by 18 months. Appendix III listing still applies until 14/09/2024.amendment

Convention on Migratory Species

Listed under CMS: Appendix II. Also covered by Sharks, which are separate instruments with their own annexes.

IUCN Red List derived

Assessment history. Scope is always stated: a regional assessment is not the species status.

This history crosses a criteria revision

Categories from before 2001 come from earlier Red List systems. Three kinds are kept apart.

LR/lc and LR/nt are the modern LC and NT under their old names, so they are plotted as those categories and the line runs through them: nothing changed but the wording.

LR/cd was discontinued with no successor. This project reads it as Near Threatened, following a published crosswalk between the old and new Red List systems, and the chart marks such a point hollow and names both codes, because placing a category is not the same as finding it published.

The pre-1994 codes (E, V, K, T and the rest) are not on the risk order at all, so they sit below the axis and the line breaks across them. A category change across a criteria revision is not a change in extinction risk, and none of these is scored as a movement: the ledger refuses every one of them at gate 3.

LCNTVUENCR19962000201020191996: Vulnerable (global)2000: Near Threatened (global)2006: Vulnerable (global)2019: Vulnerable (global)2016: Critically Endangered, assessed at Mediterranean scope, not the global statusMediterranean2015: Critically Endangered, assessed at Europe scope, not the global statusEuropeLCNTVUENCR19962000201020191996: Vulnerable (global)2000: Near Threatened (global)2006: Vulnerable (global)2019: Vulnerable (global)2016: Critically Endangered, assessed at Mediterranean scope, not the global statusMediterranean2015: Critically Endangered, assessed at Europe scope, not the global statusEurope
  • published global assessment
  • regional assessment, never joined
Vertical position is the IUCN risk order, not a measured quantity: the gaps between categories are equal on the page and not in nature. Regional assessments are shown but never joined to global ones; they describe a different population. The dashed step crosses the 2001 revision of the Red List criteria: the category codes on either side match, the criteria behind them do not, so the step is shown and not measured.

Category movement since listing: not scored. Gate 1: only one global assessment has been published since the listing, so there is no second one to measure a movement against. How this is defined and why some species are not scored

YearCategoryMeaningScopeStatus
2019VUVulnerableGlobalcurrent for this scope
2016CRCritically EndangeredMediterranean (scope corrected)
2015CRCritically EndangeredEurope (scope corrected)
2006VUVulnerableGlobal
2000LR/ntLower Risk, near threatened (1994 system)Global
1996VUVulnerableGlobal

Reported catch derived

NAMMCO catch exports dated 11 June 2025. A reported zero is stored as zero, distinct from an unknown.

No NAMMCO catch records for this species. NAMMCO reports on a subset of marine mammals, so an absence here is expected for most species and does not mean no catch occurred.

Illegal trade seizures derived

Seizure records whose reported taxon resolves to this species.

What the seizure source records

3 seizure records name this species. Matching is on the taxon the source reported, case aside, and each record below shows the reported name, so a match that is not literal can be seen for what it is. Across the whole compilation, 225 of 919 rows match one of the 43 species and the rest name other taxa.

Quantities are unitless. The source gives no date or place, so the table shows the product and the reported taxon.

Records per product, not a quantity.
ProductReported as
dead animalLamna nasus
specimenLamna nasus
specimenlamna nasus

References withheld

Machine-proposed bindings. Shown only where an expert has signed the profile and the binding is live.

No references are recorded for this species: none is shown, and none was machine-proposed for review.

Timeline curated

Curated events. Those with no corroborating table in this database are marked.

DateEventTypeCorroboration
2024-01-10CITES Trade Suspensioncites_suspensioncurated
2019-08-13CITES Trade Suspensioncites_suspensioncurated
2019-06-15CITES Trade: specimenscites_tradechecked against cites_trade_records
2019IUCN Red List Assessment (2019)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments
2018-06-15CITES Trade: finscites_tradechecked against cites_trade_records
2017-06-21EU Decision: Negativeeu_decisioncurated
2016IUCN Red List Assessment (2016)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments
2015IUCN Red List Assessment (2015)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments
2014-09-14Listed in CITES Appendix IIcites_listingchecked against cites_listings
2013-06-12Listed in CITES Appendix IIcites_listingchecked against cites_listings
2006IUCN Red List Assessment (2006)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments
2000IUCN Red List Assessment (2000)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments
1996IUCN Red List Assessment (1996)iucn_assessmentchecked against iucn_assessments

Events marked curated are not matched by a row in a corroborating table, either because none applies or because the table holds no such row, and rest on the curator alone. They are shown, and marked, rather than presented as equivalent to a table-checked fact.